SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : DON'T START THE WAR -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (20577)3/13/2003 10:29:42 PM
From: PartyTime  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25898
 
Notwithstanding your years of military service, of which I am both respectful and grateful, the sooner our soldiers get to Baghdad the longer they'll have to stay in Baghdad, and many more behind them.

What's your time estimate for an occupation force without interference? What's your time estimate for an occupation force with interference?

And let me qualify what I mean by "interference" by suggesting that you examine recent reports relative to the populational behavior in countries like Jordan, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Iran and Turkey without the influences of Al Qaeda. And when add in those influences what then will the "interference" become like for our soldiers who took Baghdad?



To: Hawkmoon who wrote (20577)3/14/2003 9:54:42 AM
From: epicure  Respond to of 25898
 
So we should do the job even if it doesn't need to be done, so we can get the job done. That's just so odd. You'd rather go to war, than avoid it. Utterly bizarre. It's like you're from another planet.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News