SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jim McMannis who wrote (164342)3/15/2003 12:42:08 PM
From: d[-_-]b  Respond to of 1573908
 
Jim,

re:Free speech is not allowed?

Didn't Trent Lott get that same lesson - hate speech from elected officials is not considered free speech.

Maybe Moran and Lott can swap stories of how the Black man is working with the Jew to take America down. <g>



To: Jim McMannis who wrote (164342)3/15/2003 12:43:12 PM
From: g_w_north  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573908
 
<Free speech is not allowed? >

Nope. Not even the Dixie Chicks can speak their minds in this environment LOL...

story.news.yahoo.com

Dixie Chicks Pulled from Air After Bashing Bush
Fri Mar 14, 6:06 PM ET Add Entertainment - Reuters/Variety Music to My Yahoo!


By Jon Herskovitz

DALLAS (Reuters) - There are a lot worse things in country music than your wife leaving you or your dog dying. There's stations not playing your music because you done gone and said some things against the president.


Music superstars the Dixie Chicks (news - web sites) are finding out that criticizing President Bush (news - web sites)'s plans for war in Iraq (news - web sites) can cost you air play, big time.

Country stations across the United States have pulled the Chicks from playlists following reports that lead singer Natalie Maines said in a concert in London earlier this week that she was "ashamed the president of the United States is from Texas."

Station managers said their decisions were prompted by calls from irate listeners who thought criticism of the president was unpatriotic.



To: Jim McMannis who wrote (164342)3/15/2003 1:12:10 PM
From: SilentZ  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573908
 
>Seems there was a congressional vote in favor of Israels tactics a while back that would support what Sharon said.
This Dem learned a hard lesson.

>Free speech is not allowed?

It's not that free speech isn't allowed... it's just that he was plain wrong. Polls indicate that Jews in this country are just as divided over the war as everyone else, and about half of the Jews that I know support the war (most of them conservatives or neo-cons), and about half are against it (most of them liberals).

-Z



To: Jim McMannis who wrote (164342)3/15/2003 5:00:04 PM
From: tejek  Respond to of 1573908
 
Free speech is not allowed?

Free speech is allowed but it can cost you a position.

ted



To: Jim McMannis who wrote (164342)3/15/2003 5:19:04 PM
From: Mani1  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573908
 
Re <<Free speech is not allowed?>>

Not unless you are criticizing the white male population.

No speech characterizing a group of minority is allowed. If you say blacks have dark skin you are a Klansman, and if you say people who go to Synagogue are jews, you are anti-Semitic.

Mani