Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (164472)	3/16/2003 11:20:14 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572707

Reread what you wrote and maybe you might see why you look to be talking from both sides of your mouth. I read it when I wrote it and I just went back when I replied to your post. If it wasn't for Bush's moves there would be no inspectors in Iraq. That isn't talking out of both sides of my mouth. Fact? How do you know at what point Saddam would have let the inspectors back in? Bush did so many things all within a short period of time, its hard to discern what was the deciding factor. One of them was moving 200k soldiers to the Gulf. Maybe that was necessary; maybe it wasn't. I actually suspect 200k soldiers in the Guld were not needed to get the inspectors back in. But moving some there and making the threats that Bush made were almost definitly needed. And it seems that 200k soldiers in the region but outside of Iraq are not enough to get full complience. Tim