Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : DON'T START THE WAR -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: PartyTime who wrote (22359)	3/17/2003 4:51:39 PM
From: eims2000	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 25898

"What I think could happen, however, is that the General Assembly could order a peacekeeping interventionary force as a buffer between the US-Brit forces and Saddam's force." You are insane.

To: PartyTime who wrote (22359)	3/17/2003 5:16:45 PM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 25898

What I think could happen, however, is that the General Assembly could order a peacekeeping interventionary force as a buffer between the US-Brit forces and Saddam's force. That would be quite Ironic.. Some countries sending forces under NO UN MANDATE to prevent another member state from enforcing one of the UN's binding resolutions?? I love it.... Kinda like the judge ordering a bunch of meter maids to prevent the sheriff from executing a search warrant issued against a fugitive, by the very same judge. Hawk@ain'titironic.com