Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: willcousa who wrote (173617)	3/18/2003 9:29:01 AM
From: rkral	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

OT ... willcousa, that's a bit over the top. Definition of "mankind" - "1. The human race; humankind. 2. Men as opposed to women." The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language If we assume an author means definition 2, instead of definition 1, that's our problem, not the author's, IMHO. We are all taking political correctness to an unnecessary extreme. Regards, Ron

To: willcousa who wrote (173617)	3/18/2003 7:31:55 PM
From: Road Walker	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 186894

Will, re: Tell that to the women who are buried up to their necks and stoned, people who are gassed or experimented on, people who are placed in a slow acting acid bath and they will see your crimes and raise you a million-fold. I thought this was a self-defense action, not a humanitarian mission. Am I wrong? What's the new US policy wrt war, and how does it apply to the rest of the countries in the world? Do we attack every country that isn't a democracy, or that tortures their citizens, or that may have "weapons of mass destruction"? Or is there a formula for a combination all of the above? At any rate, I wish Bush or someone would explain the details of the new, preemptive defense, humanitarian, anti-dictator US war policy. I think there are a lot of our former loyal allies, Germany, France, even Mexico and Canada that might also be interested. And when we are done with the spectacle of the "SHOCK AND AWE" job on real Iraqi people, maybe Bush will tell us the next logical target. John Acid bath or cruise missile, in the end does it make a difference? Which is more noble?