Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GST who wrote (154357)	3/18/2003 12:01:43 PM
From: Oeconomicus	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 164684

I agree. I didn't mean "forced selling" but rather voluntary negotiation. If someone's property was illegally taken and they want it back, they should get it. If a settler can work a deal with them, that's fine too. The settlers took substantial risk when they moved in - both physical risk and economic. The may very well lose out on the latter and that would not be unfair if they were recipients of stolen property. The important thing is that both sides behave in a just and peaceful manner - something we have seen from either in a while, but we can hope.