SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bill Wexler who wrote (9495)3/20/2003 10:18:57 AM
From: N. Dixon  Respond to of 10293
 
Re: The WEXLER stock fraud
by: dollyinvirginia (F/DC burbs)
Long-Term Sentiment: Strong Buy 03/20/03 10:16 am
Msg: 135523 of 135523

"Bill,"

Dahlinck, if you are going to do these silly n of 1 studies, at least do a couple of them so we can have some equally useless basis for comparison.

For instance, how about comparing REFR to ALGX? Last time I looked ALGX was 36 cents a share and your hedge fund's portfolio was down a hell of a lot more than mine.

Really, dear. Your fund lost 95% of its value in a year. You gotta have a screw or two loose to go on like this to people who see right through you.

Tsk, tsk.

Dolly



Posted as a reply to: Msg 135515 by billwexler



To: Bill Wexler who wrote (9495)3/20/2003 10:22:54 AM
From: N. Dixon  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 10293
 
Bill,

You left out 1998 to 2000 where you shorted at $6 and had to cover in the high 30s.

Now you've dug a hole by quintupling the short interest and still no one is selling, no one bought into your BS about REFR and we're buying at the low prices YOU created.

Look at the volume. No one is selling and you're stuck covering 2.5 million shares! I wouldn't be boasting about it.

ND



To: Bill Wexler who wrote (9495)3/20/2003 10:28:54 AM
From: N. Dixon  Respond to of 10293
 
"Bill"
by: aarrcc 03/20/03 08:28 am
Msg: 135518 of 135524

Hey, "Bill," still waiting for my answers:

1. What locations are you willing to meet with me in?
2. What "indisputable proof" do you propose to offer?

Eh?