Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: N. Dixon who wrote (9497)	3/20/2003 10:40:01 AM
From: RockyBalboa	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10293

Dixon, I expect you to produce some hard evidence that Wexler covered in the "high 30s" quite pronto, is that clear? In your whole posting career, you generally failed to produce facts. All you utter are "might be", "will be" etc, if not totally unproven assertions, irrelevant whether concerning your pet, or people which don't share your rosy views.

To: N. Dixon who wrote (9497)	3/20/2003 5:26:16 PM
From: Bill Wexler	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10293

Dixon caught in (yet another) lie. True: I've shorted REFR at low prices...and I've also shorted it at high prices. However: As usual, you spin the truth to fit your own delusional world-view. 1) I have NEVER covered REFR at any price above 7. And - of course - you can't come up with any evidence to the contrary. 2) You have claimed in hundreds, if not thousands of insane, ranting posts that "the shorts can't cover". You also said many times that I haven't/couldn't cover. NOW you say I that I did cover. Message 18650630 Were you lying then...or are you lying now?