Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stop the War! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Patricia Trinchero who wrote (967)	3/21/2003 5:58:56 PM
From: Augustus Gloop	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21614

Regardless of Bush's environmental record can you come up with a logical reason why it would have been better for us to allow Saddam to torch his wells? I can't. It wouldn't be good for the environment, Iraqi people or global oil prices. So knowing that I guess I would ask again if you would have been happier had they all been blown up? I don't think you would have other than the possibility of making Bush look like the cause of the disaster. Clearly even that would be wrong because only on Saddams orders were those wells set on fire.