Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : CNBC -- critique. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mark Marcellus who wrote (12064)	3/23/2003 12:55:27 PM
From: sandintoes	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 17683

If Clinton had handled things in exactly the same manner, (not that he would have, he's brighter than that) the Right would be all over him. How much of a free ride would the right have given him if he'd called N. Korea on their surreptitious nuclear efforts, only to do nothing when they aggressively expanded them? And this with a government that has shown absolutely no scruples about providing WMD to the highest bidder. Instead, Clinton had our soldiers dragged through the streets naked when led to battle by the big brave UN...the biggest waste of my taxdollars to date. As for Clinton's handling of anything, unless he got money under the table for selling secrets and weapons to the enemy, he didn't deal with anything. He let Janet Reno fight his fights, and had a little five year old boy hauled away at gun point in the middle of the night to show the White House bravery under Clinton.