Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Attack Iraq? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Doren who wrote (5011)	3/25/2003 5:33:24 PM
From: H-Man	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 8683

The discovery of the chemical plant south of Baghdad is plain evidence that the inspections were not working and had no real chance of working. Even assuming that this plant was not used for weapons (doubtful - why the camoflage?), it is evidence that inspections were not working because the inspectors new nothing about it. It should have been high on the list of places to inspect. The inspectors were finding it little by little Yes, which as I have pointed out, could have gone on for decades. In the meantime, how much was produced in the plant south of Baghdad? You seem to be bending over backwards to defend Saddam. You have nothing but kook theory on your side and all the evidence against you.