SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: hueyone who wrote (154672)3/24/2003 9:56:27 AM
From: Oeconomicus  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 164684
 
their cultures are often so ingrained with a history of barbarism and ruthless dictators, that it is probably unrealistic to think they are capable of embracing democracy and becoming responsible world community members. It may take another ruthless dictator like Saddam to run the place.

Arabs are not culturally "capable of embracing democracy?" Huey, that ridiculous. You probably would have said the same thing about Germany and Japan in 1945, as did many people at the time.



To: hueyone who wrote (154672)3/24/2003 10:42:25 AM
From: Bill Harmond  Respond to of 164684
 
Huey, I think that if free reporters were embedded in Iraqi positions you would feel more encouraged.



To: hueyone who wrote (154672)3/24/2003 11:57:35 AM
From: Lizzie Tudor  Respond to of 164684
 
According to "the guardian" online (not sure I know if that is a biased source?)- the chemical weapons plant was built by the UK some years ago which is why the US backed down the media machine in promoting their "find". Regardless of who built it, it seems like it did produce chemical weapons.

The problem now though, is whether the iraqis themselves will view the US as liberators or conquerors, it looks like the latter and that is not optimal.