SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: cfoe who wrote (87136)3/27/2003 10:42:59 PM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
oneoftheveryfewpeoplewhovotesrepublicaninberkeley.


That's OK, our moderator will stop by and and take you to lunch this week.

lindybill@LethimshareourQuakerOatsCausehesusefulwhenhevotes.com



To: cfoe who wrote (87136)3/27/2003 10:46:30 PM
From: Jacob Snyder  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
<oneoftheveryfewpeoplewhovotesrepublicaninberkeley>

OT: The mirror image of my situation. Alaska gave Gore 28% in 2000, (only Utah gave him a lower %).

If each State's electoral college votes were allocated proportionally (rather than winner-take-all), the vote would have been:

Gore 263
Bush 263
Nader 12

So it would have been Nader, not a Supreme Court Judge, casting the deciding vote.