SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (381025)3/28/2003 4:21:23 PM
From: Land Shark  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
OIL, what an appropriate accronym! Surely that's no coincidence.



To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (381025)3/28/2003 4:28:19 PM
From: Neeka  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769670
 
You are obviously of a mind that the current administration is only interested in the oil lying beneath the sands of Iraq. That that is the only motive for going in to Iraq. That the current administration is a selfish, greedy group on individuals only interested in filling their pockets with lots and lots of oil money.

If that were the case, why didn't they just negotiate for oil behind everyone's back rather than make it public in such a huge manner?


If it was about OIL, they would have undercut our friends in France, Germany and Russia. After all, they are such experts about the oil industry.

You guys on the left are so dense.

M



To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (381025)3/28/2003 9:48:42 PM
From: Srexley  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
"That's why we have "Operation Iraqi Liberation", more readily known as OIL..... "

Doesn't it seem strange to you to support this position, when it is France and Russia who are against us that have the lucrative oil contracts with Saddam. They are against a safer world so they can get cheap oil from an oppressive dictator. That is what you are supporting. Screw the Iraqi people as long as the frogs get cheap oil. Disgusting.