To: Jacob Snyder who wrote (87674 ) 3/29/2003 1:43:49 PM From: Neocon Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500 Beyond the Final Scorecard How did Reagan contribute to the demise of the Soviet empire? You can draw up a scorecard and count the economic costs that Reagan’s policies placed on a struggling Soviet economy, using Moscow’s numbers: • The second strand of the European natural gas pipeline Reagan stopped: lost revenue, $7–8 billion a year • The cost of counterinsurgency operations against Reagan-backed guerrillas: $8 billion a year • Extra arms shipped to Cuba to soothe anxieties following the U.S. invasion of Grenada: $3 billion • Military spending increases announced to match Reagan’s: $15–20 billion a year • Lost revenue due to restrictions on technology imports: $1–2 billion a year • Lost revenue from a sudden drop in oil prices: $5–6 billion a year • Extra aid delivered to Poland after Reagan’s sanctions: $1 billion This amounts to a hefty price tag for a superpower that had total hard-currency earnings of approximately $32 billion at the time. Or you can look at the body blows that the Soviet empire suffered. Military defeat in Afghanistan demoralized the Kremlin and the military as they suffered their first defeat of the Cold War. At the same time, the survival and eventual triumph of Solidarity in Poland burned a hole in the heart of the empire that could never be filled. In both of these cases, Reagan proved decisive in victory. Since the end of the Cold War, a debate has raged about how it ended. It is fashionable now to denigrate Reagan’s role in winning the Cold War. His achievements and strategic vision are minimized in many quarters. We are often offered the image of Reagan as an amiable bumpkin who just happened to be there when it all happened around him. But not only was Reagan passionate and courageous in battle, he had a well-developed plan seeking the demise of the Soviet Union. Developed over the course of 30 years and spelled out in detail through several top-secret national security directives while he was president, the ideas and concepts behind it were largely his own. Make no mistake: This “bumpkin” won the Cold War. It is revealing, though, that one person who never got wrapped up in this debate was Ronald Reagan. One of the last items to be removed from his Oval Office desk in January 1989 was a small sign that read “It’s surprising what you can accomplish when no one is concerned about who gets the credit.” Today we live in a world very different from the one only a quarter-century ago. There is no longer talk of a large-scale war in Europe, no fear of a massive nuclear strike. Understanding Reagan’s struggle and final triumph over communism involves more than debating the past or deciding who gets the credit. It provides us wisdom and hope for the struggles of today and tomorrow. Reagan’s hope that we be guided not by fear but by courage and moral clarity is as apt today as it was during the height of the Cold War.www-hoover.stanford.edu