SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: LLCF who wrote (30437)3/30/2003 10:42:34 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 74559
 
Hello DAK, It could be that the danger (to world peace, economy and finances) is if Rumsfeld achieves campaign victory with shame while allowing Iraq a war defeat with honor.

The max danger could be if the US stops its attack after giving a good try.

The super max danger could be if the US tries occupation without nation-building success.

At this moment, both sides can invite the participation of HK tourist mercenaries, and fight a SARS germ warfare campaign by proxy. A sort of grand unification of the sum of all fears;0)

Chugs, Jay



To: LLCF who wrote (30437)3/31/2003 12:57:15 AM
From: smolejv@gmx.net  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74559
 
>>Hopefully they get rid of that Rumsfeld character<< but then it's back to square one in terms of planning etc,is it not?