SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: zonder who wrote (69167)4/3/2003 8:53:05 AM
From: Fred Levine  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 70976
 
To see issues with one-sided clarity must be a blessing. Even if reality doesn't comply. IMO, there are several culprits involved in this mess. Saddam, for his crimes against humanity and his not complying with 1441, the UN for not enforcing crimes against humanity nor 1441, and Bush for plodding ahead unnecessarily.

In the immediate background is 9/11, which correctly did lead to some paranoia. When 9/11 happened, IMO, the rest was predictable. Tragically, it was not predicted by bin Laden.

fred



To: zonder who wrote (69167)4/3/2003 9:01:36 AM
From: Sun Tzu  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 70976
 
At last I find an honest NeoCon...and he is Canadian!
Message 18787379
Message 18789880

The interesting thing is that after he came out and said these, the rest of the pro-war camp just said, "well yes, but our political system does not let us to be honest and come right out". In other words, all this moral high ground chest pounding is a marketing strategy.

On a related note, I think Iraqis will be happy to be free of Saddam. So in that sense US is the liberating army, even though that is not the goal (as stated above). But, what US seems to under-estimate is the pent up level of anger for the sanctions (among other reasons). The biggest opposition group to Saddam has been the Islamists. Having fought Saddam for most of their lives, they are not just going to let US walk in and install whoever it wants. So expect problems in about 6 months after fall of Baghdad.

ST

Zonder: I look forward to less arguments that start (and end) with "But he is evil" or "But he killed Kurds 12 years ago!" and more "Invading Iraq now is better than all alternatives because....".



To: zonder who wrote (69167)4/3/2003 5:03:37 PM
From: Fred Levine  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 70976
 
>>I look forward to less arguments that start (and end) with "But he is evil" or "But he killed Kurds 12 years ago!" and more "Invading Iraq now is better than all alternatives because....". <<

Tell me Zonder how you would respond if Bush gassed blacks 12 years ago. Would you say the same things that you are saying about Saddam. Central to my arguments is that we're replacing Saddam. That is the point you seem to avoid.

fred