SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stop the War! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ChrisJP who wrote (7452)4/4/2003 7:26:10 AM
From: thames_sider  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 21614
 
We are always trying to build better weapons.

No one is arguing that the cluster bomb is anything but an extremely *effective* weapon - it's superb at killing people. I assume this isn't what you mean...?

I'd say at maybe 20% of what you're seeing on the battlefield is really the Dept. of Defense testing what they built.
IMHO this would rank as disgusting practice if true... "Let's test out these in a war and see how many innocents they kill"... eerily reminiscent of testing incapacitant/poison gases and surgical procedures on prisoners.

If you must develop cluster bombs (the EU has voted to ban them from European armed forces, precisely because they are so lethal afterwards for civilians) then test them on a closed range - and then send out the developers, and their managers, to find out in person exactly how 'effective' their work is, and how safe it is afterwards.
This should also prove quite 'effective'.