SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stop the War! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mike M who wrote (7499)4/4/2003 9:44:00 AM
From: thames_sider  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 21614
 
You won't find any disagreement with me that innocent deaths have been kept very low... indeed, I've commented on it.

Cluster bombs, however, are not a discriminate form of weapon: if they're being used on the outskirts of a town, whether against a(transient) military presence or not, what you are effectively doing is laying a large unmarked minefield in which no one knows exactly where the mines are.
The best of them have a ~5% non-explode rate - meaning that the best of these bombs will leave 15-25 small, dangerous mines.
They can and do kill innocents - often small children, who see brightly-coloured objects and investigate - for many years afterwards. Have you not read any of the testimony from Laos, or Cambodia, or Afghanistan, or Kosovo...?
That's why I've suggested that the developers be given a real incentive to get them right, before they're seen as fit for use.

Gloating that "War is hell!" does not improve your case, BTW. I suggest you go and say it so happily in a field hospital. perhaps you could quote it to a few victims of cluser bombs, or their parents... think they'd happily write it off so glibly?