Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stop the War! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (8746)	4/6/2003 7:30:40 PM
From: Jorj X Mckie	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 21614

Saddam Hussein is not a problem without WMDs. OBL sure was a problem without WMDs

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (8746)	4/6/2003 8:07:39 PM
From: Lazarus_Long	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 21614

Since we are all over Baghdad We are? We've got complete and effective control of all of Baghdad? WHOPPEE! But that certainly contradicts what I've heard. What I've heard is we have control only of a rather small section of it. What's your plan if they do surface? Or if, in a real fit of idiocy, Saddam uses them? He didn't violate any UN resolutions unless the US can prove weapons existed. If nothing else, he was required to actively cooperate in PROVING they did not exist. Now surely you're not going to argue he met THAT requirement?

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (8746)	4/6/2003 9:02:19 PM
From: broadstbull	Respond to of 21614

Well Lizzie, you wanted to give the UN more time correct? 12 years wasn't enough, six months before the war wasn't enough. But, you expect our troops to find the WMD in 3 weeks while fighting a war at the same time? You are really starting to sound like a sore sport Lizzie. Give it a rest! Don't be upset that we are winning the war. I'm sure you'd have American soldiers defeated just to prove you were right. Sorry Lizzie, you sound like a baby.