Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Gary Ng who wrote (69296)	4/7/2003 9:34:56 AM
From: zonder	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 70976

the procedure USUK used was not correct I see you liked the abbreviation :-)

To: Gary Ng who wrote (69296)	4/7/2003 4:00:13 PM
From: E. T.	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 70976

I see, thanks for clearing that up... "obtaining the evidence is equally if not more important than the evidence itself. Applying on the Iraq case, the procedure USUK used was not correct which void the case." I disagree. Saddam is a despot with WMDs and I percieve him as a threat. I don't think he's playing by anybody's rules; years of sanctions didn't work, inspector's were his dupes, he's a guy that doesn't mind killing people by the thousands. I see the sword falling and you don't. United States didn't want to wait for the rest of the world to pick its nose on Iraq, just like Israel didn't ask the world if it could blow up saddam's nuclear reactor in the 80s. Your notion of the importance of following "proper procedure" would likely have Saddam with nuclear weapons today.