Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Classic TA Workplace -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: AllansAlias who wrote (70873)	4/8/2003 2:13:32 PM
From: jjstingray	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 209892

Hey workin man, what are you doing here. I thought your CMCSA would see some follow through on the downside, no such luck. Are you holding?

To: AllansAlias who wrote (70873)	4/8/2003 2:15:01 PM
From: At_The_Ask	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 209892

We disagree. Also it's not valid due to 1-4 overlap. Even on a close only the overlap is still there. I think you are overlooking way to many inviolable rules. Especially wrt to compx. You would be stating that wave 2 can be more than 100% of wave one. You gotta throw in the towel on stuff sooner or later. Or at least be looking for a diagonal. I remember another guy who overlooked the 2 can't be larger than one rule. His name was gem-x.

To: AllansAlias who wrote (70873)	4/8/2003 11:03:57 PM
From: Perspective	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 209892

VXN and VIX are getting to levels I've been waiting for in order to go short again: stockcharts.com!b200!f%5D%5Bvc60%5D%5BiUb14!La12,26,9%5D&pref=G I guess it may be a reflection of the ranging behavior we've been having for months now, but the fact remains that the odds bet is going to have to be for increasing volatility, a break of the range, and return of trend. Elliot says the odds bet is for the prior trend to be reasserted after a period of ringing such as we've had. BC