SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stop the War! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (10137)4/9/2003 10:21:26 AM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 21614
 
My view on opposition to the war.

I see the opposition as being grouped into four different categories. The first I would see as sort of the MLK/Ghandi types who are opposed to war in any instance. These people feel that war and violence is never justified. I can respect the moral conviction of this group but I am nevertheless quite pleased that the persons running our government do not share those convictions.

The next group is the group of people who acknowledge the facts, that Saddam is a megalomaniac and murderer and whose regime has been guilty of numerous atrocities, seeks WMD, has launched wars of aggression, etc. But, this group of people adds up the facts and decides that war in this case was not justified. This group does not add up the facts in such a way that the regime in Baghdad is, in their opinion, a direct threat to the US. About this I think it may be fairly said, reasonable minds MIGHT disagree. The Administration has not always made an effective case for its position, although I think after Sec. State Powell's presentation to the UN this became a much tougher argument. Nevertheless, this is an opinion I can still respect to a large degree.

The next group I think is the group which simply does not know the facts. They parrot what they might hear from various opposition groups but really have no command of the situation and are unable to intellectually challenge any of the reasons which might justify this war. For these people, I have no time. There is really no excuse for ignorance in this information age.

Finally, the last group is the group which is unable to move beyond the petty, partisan prism through which they view all actions of the government. These are the people we hear constantly spewing conspiracy theories, decrying "war profiteering", questioning the legitimacy of the Administration, still fighting the last election, decrying "chickenhawks" and the other myriad methods which have been so evident on the boards. These same people claim to support the troops whole denigrating the very mission for which more than 80 have given their lives. These people, IMO, are unamerican and unpatriotic. While these actions may not rise to the level of treason, their efforts do provide aid and comfort to the enemy. They provide a reason for the regime in Baghdad to hope they may influence the outcome of the war by indicating that public opinion might force the Administration to abandon the decision which has been taken and which is supported by more than 70% of the American public. As if the actions of this group in support of our enemy are not bad enough, this group denigrates the support of the American public for the Administration by various methods such as questioning the intelligence and critical thinking of those who are supportive. Although the outcome of this war seems no longer in doubt, it is not a stretch to say that in a more sustained campaign, such actions might well have led to a more protracted battle and more US casualties. IMO, the members of this group do not deserve any respect and should be confronted with the derision and scorn they so richly deserve. This does not mean they should not be able to express those opinions, but neither should such persons be insulated from the justifiable consequences, economic or social, that giving voice to such opinions may engender.

Let the flames begin.<g>