SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Impeach George W. Bush -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: MSI who wrote (20706)4/9/2003 4:22:03 PM
From: KonKilo  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 93284
 
From Michael Moore:
bartcop.com

My Oscar "Backlash":
"Stupid White Men" Back At #1, "Bowling" Breaks New Records

 Dear Friends,

 It appears that the Bush administration will have succeeded in colonizing Iraq
 sometime in the next few days. This is a blunder of such magnitude -- and we will
 pay for it for years to come. It was not worth the life of one single American kid in
 uniform, let alone the thousands of Iraqis who have died, and my condolences and
 prayers go out to all of them.

 So, where are all those weapons of mass destruction that were the pretense for this war?
 Ha! There is so much to say about all this, but I will save it for later.

 What I am most concerned about right now is that all of you -- the majority of Americans
 who did not support this war in the first place -- not go silent or be intimidated by what will
 be touted as some great military victory. Now, more than ever, the voices of peace and truth
 must be heard. I have received a lot of mail from people who are feeling a profound sense of
 despair and believe that their voices have been drowned out by the drums and bombs of false
 patriotism. Some are afraid of retaliation at work or at school or in their neighborhoods because
 they have been vocal proponents of peace. They have been told over and over that it is not
 "appropriate" to protest once the country is at war, and that your only duty now is to "support the troops."

 Can I share with you what it's been like for me since I used my time on the Oscar stage two weeks
 ago to speak out against Bush and this war? I hope that, in reading what I'm about to  tell you, you'll
 feel a bit more emboldened to make your voice heard in whatever way or forum that is open to you.

 When "Bowling for Columbine" was announced as the Oscar winner for Best Documentary at the
 Academy Awards, the audience rose to its feet. It was a great moment, one that I will always cherish.
 They were standing and cheering for a film that says we Americans are a uniquely violent people,
 using our massive stash of guns to kill each other and to use them against many countries around
 the world. They were applauding a film that shows George W. Bush using fictitious fears to frighten
 the public into giving him whatever he wants. And they were honoring a film that states the following:
 The first Gulf War was an attempt to reinstall the dictator of Kuwait; Saddam Hussein was armed
 with weapons from the United States; and the American government is responsible for the deaths
 of a half-million children in Iraq over the past decade through its sanctions and bombing. That was
 the movie they were cheering, that was the movie they voted for, and so I decided that is what I
 should acknowledge in my speech.

 And, thus, I said the following from the Oscar stage:

"On behalf of our producers Kathleen Glynn and Michael Donovan (from Canada), I would like to
 thank the Academy for this award. I have invited the other Documentary nominees on stage with me.
 They are here in solidarity because we like non-fiction. We like non-fiction because we live in
 fictitious times. We live in a time where fictitious election results give us a fictitious president.
 We are now fighting a war for fictitious reasons. Whether it's the fiction of duct tape or the fictitious
 'Orange Alerts,' we are against this war, Mr. Bush. Shame on you, Mr. Bush, shame on you. And,
 whenever you've got the Pope and the Dixie Chicks against you, you're time is up."

 Halfway through my remarks, some in the audience started to cheer. That immediately set off a
 group of people in the balcony who started to boo. Then those supporting my remarks started to
 shout down the booers. The L. A. Times reported that the director of the show started screaming
 at the orchestra "Music! Music!" in order to cut me off, so the band dutifully struck up a tune and
 my time was up. (For more on why I said what I said, you can read the op-ed I wrote for the L.A.
 Times, plus other reaction from around the country at my website)

 The next day -- and in the two weeks since -- the right-wing pundits and radio shock jocks have
 been calling for my head. So, has all this ruckus hurt me? Have they succeeded in "silencing" me?

 Well, take a look at my Oscar "backlash":

 -- On the day after I criticized Bush and the war at the Academy Awards, attendance at "Bowling for
 Columbine" in theaters around the country went up 110% (source: Daily Variety/BoxOfficeMojo.com).
 The following weekend, the box office gross was up a whopping 73% (Variety). It is now the longest
 -running consecutive commercial release in America, 26 weeks in a row and still thriving. The number
 of theaters showing the film since the Oscars has INCREASED, and it has now bested the previous
 box office record for a documentary by nearly 300%.

 -- Yesterday (April 6), "Stupid White Men" shot back to #1 on the New York Times bestseller list.
 This is my book's 50th week on the list, 8 of them at number one, and this marks its fourth return to
 the top position, something that virtually never happens.

 -- In the week after the Oscars, my website was getting 10-20 million hits A DAY (one day we even
 got more hits than the White House!). The mail has been overwhelmingly positive and supportive
 (and the hate mail has been hilarious!).

 -- In the two days following the Oscars, more people pre-ordered the video for "Bowling for Columbine"
 on Amazon.com than the video for the Oscar winner for Best Picture, "Chicago."

 -- In the past week, I have obtained funding for my next documentary, and I have been offered a slot
 back on television to do an updated version of "TV Nation"/ "The Awful Truth."

 I tell you all of this because I want to counteract a message that is told to us all the time -- that, if you
 take a chance to speak out politically, you will live to regret it. It will hurt you in some way, usually
 financially. You could lose your job. Others may not hire you, You will lose friends. And on and on and on.

 Take the Dixie Chicks. I'm sure you've all heard by now that, because their lead singer mentioned how
 she was ashamed that Bush was from her home state of Texas, their record sales have "plummeted"
 and country stations are boycotting their music. The truth is that their sales are NOT down. This week,
 after all the attacks, their album is still at #1 on the Billboard country charts and, according to
 Entertainment Weekly, on the pop charts during all the brouhaha, they ROSE from #6 to #4.
 In the New York Times, Frank Rich reports that he tried to find a ticket to ANY of the Dixie Chicks'
 upcoming concerts but he couldn't because they were all sold out. (To read Rich's column from
 yesterday's Times, "Bowling for Kennebunkport," go here. He does a pretty good job of laying it all out
 and talks about my next film and the impact it could potentially have.) Their song, "Travelin' Soldier"
 (a beautiful anti-war ballad) was the most requested song on the internet last week. They have not
 been hurt at all -- but that is not what the media would have you believe. Why is that? Because there
 is nothing more important now than to keep the voices of dissent -- and those who would dare to ask
 a question -- SILENT. And what better way than to try and take a few well-known entertainers down
 with a pack of lies so that the average Joe or Jane gets the message loud and clear: "Wow, if they
 would do that to the Dixie Chicks or Michael Moore, what would they do to little ol' me?"
 In other words, shut the fuck up.

 And that, my friends, is the real point of this film that I just got an Oscar for -- how those in charge
 use FEAR to manipulate the public into doing whatever they are told.

 Well, the good news -- if there can be any good news this week -- is that not only have neither I nor
 others been silenced, we have been joined by millions of Americans who think the same way we do.
 Don't let the false patriots intimidate you by setting the agenda or the terms of the debate. Don't be
 defeated by polls that show 70% of the public in favor of the war. Remember that these Americans
 being polled are the same Americans whose kids (or neighbor's kids) have been sent over to Iraq.
 They are scared for the troops and they are being cowed into supporting a war they did not want
 -- and they want even less to see their friends, family, and neighbors come home dead. Everyone
 supports the troops returning home alive and all of us need to reach out and let their families know that.

 Unfortunately, Bush and Co. are not through yet. This invasion and conquest will encourage them
 to do it again elsewhere. The real purpose of this war was to say  to the rest of the world,
 "Don't Mess with Texas - If You Got What We Want, We're Coming to Get It!"

 This is not the time for the majority of us who believe in a peaceful America to be quiet.
 Make your voices heard. Despite what they have pulled off, it is still our country.

 Yours,

 Michael Moore

 www.michaelmoore.com



To: MSI who wrote (20706)4/9/2003 10:42:30 PM
From: KonKilo  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 93284
 
War Profiteers

by Rep. Ron Paul, MD
lewrockwell.com
       

The president asked Congress last week to authorize new funding for the war in Iraq, which was not paid for in the wasteful budget recently passed in the House of Representatives. You might assume that Congress would simply approve legislation that pays for military supplies and hardware, troop wages, ammunition, fuel, food, and the like. In other words, the bread and butter items that our troops need to prosecute the war in Iraq.

But nothing is simple in Washington. Congress could not resist the opportunity to put its hands in taxpayers' pockets by adding 20 billion dollars in completely unrelated spending to the final bill. In essence, Congress is so addicted to spending that it will use any opportunity, even a war, to spend money for every conceivable reason – however unrelated to the war in Iraq.

We must understand that America is in a financial crisis. Tax revenues are down due to the faltering economy, but congressional spending has exploded by more than 22% in just two years. As a result, annual deficits have risen rapidly, and the national debt now approaches 6.5 trillion dollars. Almost all of this new spending has been completely unrelated to homeland defense or national security concerns. The same old failed domestic agencies and special-interest pork programs have received the bulk of the dollars. While Congress should fund constitutional federal functions like national defense, our very solvency as a nation is being threatened by unconstitutional spending.

Here are some examples of what ended up in the "war funding" bill:

*
$3.2 billion for an airline bailout – even though the airlines always seem to be troubled and always feel they deserve tax money. If we bail out the airlines, why not the hotels, restaurants, and rental car agencies that have been affected by 9-11 and the war in Iraq? Why not every industry that's suffering?;

*
$125 million for congressional security, to make sure members are safe even if the country is not;

*
$11 million for salaries and expenses for the House of Representatives, who already approved a pay raise for themselves last fall;

*
$250 million for Department of Agriculture grants;

*
$69 million for something called the Bill Emerson Humanitarian Trust;

*
$5.5 million for the Library of Congress;

*
$6.8 million for the Congressional Research Service and General Accounting Office;

*
$100,000 for the U.S. Court of International Trade.

The bill also includes $8 billion in foreign aid, which is especially egregious given the state of the American economy. How can we ask taxpayers to send billions abroad with things so tough for many here at home?

The $8 billion includes:

*
$1 billion in "economic assistance" for Turkey, even though they refused to let America use its bases to stage our assault on Iraq and have only grudgingly allowed use of its airspace;

*
$700 million for Jordan;

*
$500 million for Egypt;

*
$127 million for Afghanistan;

*
$1 billion in for Israel;

*
$175 million for Pakistan;

*
$170 million to train the "Afghan National Army";

*
$406 million for Jordan;

And the list goes on and on. All of this is of course in addition to the standard foreign aid we send these nations and many others every year.

These are just some examples of how Congress takes every possible opportunity to spend your money, even when it should be focused on the war in Iraq. Was it really too much to ask for a clean bill to fund the president's request, a bill unencumbered by pork handouts and useless foreign aid? Apparently not even war can prevent Congress from shamelessly sticking its hands in your pockets while cloaking itself in "support the troops' rhetoric.

April 9, 2003

Dr. Ron Paul is a Republican member of Congress from Texas.