Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: American Spirit who wrote (167502)	4/11/2003 12:45:19 PM
From: JakeStraw	Respond to of 1583466

American Schoolgirl, Funny how many women HAVEN'T come out with the TRUTH about the Slick Willie! Ever think that's because Clinton got to them first!

To: American Spirit who wrote (167502)	4/11/2003 1:27:49 PM
From: Joe NYC	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1583466

AS, The character assassins of the right have been well-known to have been offering big money to any woman in Arkansas who would step forward with a tale to tell, even a tall tale. The money finally lured a few out. For that they were all compensated. If Broderick is any different it would indeed be puzzling. Now that sounds different. So you don't know, and you have no proof. Making a specific charge that Juanita Broadrick was paid to come public with her story with no knowledge and no proof is what? Isn't it dishonest, slimy, a character assassination? I take it that this is your admission of being a slime ball, dishonest and guilty of character assassination. (charges you yourself have been throwing around in this post, and and other posts) Message 18826271 Joe