Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (98499)	4/12/2003 11:15:33 AM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 132070

64.39.15.171

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (98499)	4/15/2003 5:20:36 PM
From: Yogizuna	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 132070

When propaganda wins out over truth, we are all in big trouble....

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (98499)	4/28/2003 12:07:15 PM
From: Skeeter Bug	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 132070

knighty, but ya gotta admit, our propaganda was humbled by baghdad bob... -lol- hey, the dems have really been out to lunch wrt to the tax cut issue. i hear the pubs saying, "why should 1% of the people pay 40% of the taxes? that's not fair." i'm STILL WAITING for a dem to say, "b/c the top 1% own 40% of america's stuff. sounds perfectly fair to me!" the % may be off a little, but ya get the point. the dems have been silent. also, if a tax cut for the wealthy is being sold as a "jobs program," then why don't the dems come up with "trickle up." after all, if the poor get more money then they'll spend it on goods and services, thereby creating more demand for stuff and creating many more jobs than the richest 1% buying more GE stock. a trickle up dollar is a much better jobs creator than trickile down. so why is bush robbing us of jobs by giving almost all the cut to the wealthy? i know. but the dems can't articulate it cogently.