SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Graystone who wrote (92867)4/12/2003 2:01:57 PM
From: paul_philp  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 

Surely, at the start of our 21st century, we should have evolved beyond the point where we reduce a country and a people to dust, for the flimsiest of excuses.


The War in Afgahnistan was based on a flimsy excuse?

Although the rest of the diatribe is easy to refute, I won't because the author's facts are untrustworthy if this is analysis of the war.

The general methodology of using perfection as the yardstick to measure Afghanistan instead of measuring progress since the fall of the Taliban is odious.

Afghanistan has been in a state of war for 30 years. It will take a very long time to get even a basic level of functioning across the entire country. Afghanistan will be a Rorshack test for people of all political stripes for a long time.

People forget that the UN is running the humanitarian show in Afghanistan.

Paul



To: Graystone who wrote (92867)4/13/2003 12:14:01 AM
From: Sun Tzu  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
I don't think (in fact I am pretty sure) that Iraqi will not end up like Afghanistan. Rumsfeld put it best in a news interview when he was asked if Iraq could be the next Afghanistan. In his words, that is not likely, Iraq has oil. So there. They are different...of course the fact that promises were made to Afghanistan means zip.