SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: LindyBill who wrote (92967)4/12/2003 5:53:21 PM
From: kumar  Respond to of 281500
 
At that level (operational for humanitarian aid) it's reputation is way ahead of it's performance.

Got examples ? I have one that affected me personally - UN organized milk bags distributed in India when I was a kid.
The milk powder was from New Zealand, the rail wagons were from a number of countries, working under a UN umbrella.



To: LindyBill who wrote (92967)4/12/2003 6:12:12 PM
From: JohnM  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
At that level it's reputation is way ahead of it's performance. John could fill you in on that from the book by Priest,. . .

Actually, her larger point is not simply that the UN doesn't do it well. No one does, so long as we are talking about the followup to conflict, that is Bosnia, et al. Her point is that it has been, for US foreign policy purposes, a function of the State department but for funding reasons, it has become a function of the Pentagon. They don't do it well. Lots of illustrations from her book. The not so implicit point of the book is that the UN and State could do it better if they were funded at appropriate levels.