Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Canadian Political Free-for-All -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: marcos who wrote (2437)	4/14/2003 12:34:52 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 37073

Separate issues yes, but current US actions on them are equally indicative of the same overweening arrogance As far as the trade dispute goes, all sorts of countries have trade disputes and argue other each others real and imagined subsidies or trade barriers, insisting the other country has to change them. As far as invading Iraq well any invasion shows some degree of arrogance but it would be just as arrogant if France and Canada and Russia supported it. Its arrogance towards the regime in Iraq not towards the world. The action is against Iraq. the same impulse that leads the Bush II regime to shake its fist at the rest of us on the planet I don't think he's doing that so much as he is behaving in ways that causes some of the rest of the world to shake their fist at him. but US troops pointing guns at us here, we don't ever want to see that I think you would have to look long and hard to find someone who did. I don't think you would find anyone in the current administration who supported invading Canada or even threatening an invasion or attack. As for invading Syria or engaging in "perma-war" we shall see but I think your wrong about this. Tim