SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Donkey's Inn -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mephisto who wrote (6700)4/15/2003 1:01:36 PM
From: Mephisto  Respond to of 15516
 
[National Library and Archives in Baghdad Looted and Burned]

Robert Fisk: Library
books, letters and
priceless documents are
set ablaze in final chapter
of the sacking of Baghdad


argument.independent.co.uk
15 April 2003


So yesterday was the burning of books.


First came the looters, then the arsonists.
It was the final chapter in the sacking of
Baghdad. The National Library and
Archives ­ a priceless treasure of Ottoman
historical documents, including the old
royal archives of Iraq ­ were turned to
ashes in 3,000 degrees of heat. Then the
library of Korans at the Ministry of Religious
Endowment was set ablaze.


I saw the looters. One of them cursed me
when I tried to reclaim a book of Islamic
law from a boy of no more than 10. Amid
the ashes of Iraqi history, I found a file
blowing in the wind outside: pages of
handwritten letters between the court of
Sharif Hussein of Mecca, who started the
Arab revolt against the Turks for Lawrence
of Arabia, and the Ottoman rulers of
Baghdad.

And the Americans did nothing.
All over the
filthy yard they blew, letters of
recommendation to the courts of Arabia,
demands for ammunition for troops,
reports on the theft of camels and attacks
on pilgrims, all in delicate hand-written
Arabic script. I was holding in my hands the last Baghdad vestiges of
Iraq's written history.

But for Iraq, this is Year Zero; with the destruction of
the antiquities in the Museum of Archaeology on Saturday and the
burning of the National Archives and then the Koranic library, the cultural
identity of Iraq is being erased. Why? Who set these fires? For what
insane purpose is this heritage being destroyed?


When I caught sight of the Koranic library burning ­ flames 100 feet high
were bursting from the windows ­ I raced to the offices of the occupying
power, the US Marines' Civil Affairs Bureau. An officer shouted to a
colleague that "this guy says some biblical [sic] library is on fire". I gave
the map location, the precise name ­ in Arabic and English. I said the
smoke could be seen from three miles away and it would take only five
minutes to drive there. Half an hour later, there wasn't an American at the
scene ­ and the flames were shooting 200 feet into the air.


There was a time when the Arabs said that their books were written in
Cairo, printed in Beirut and read in Baghdad. Now they burn libraries in
Baghdad. In the National Archives were not just the Ottoman records of
the Caliphate, but even the dark years of the country's modern history,
handwritten accounts of the 1980-88 Iran-Iraq war, with personal
photographs and military diaries,and microfiche copies of Arabic
newspapers going back to the early 1900s.

But the older files and archives were on the upper floors of the library
where petrol must have been used to set fire so expertly to the building.
The heat was such that the marble flooring had buckled upwards and the
concrete stairs that I climbedhad been cracked.


The papers on the floor were almost too hot to touch, bore no print or
writing, and crumbled into ash the moment I picked them up. Again,
standing in this shroud of blue smoke and embers, I asked the same
question: why?

So, as an all-too-painful reflection on what this means, let me quote from
the shreds of paper that I found on the road outside, blowing in the wind,
written by long-dead men who wrote to the Sublime Porte in Istanbul or to
the Court of Sharif of Mecca with expressions of loyalty and who signed
themselves "your slave". There was a request to protect a camel convoy
of tea, rice and sugar, signed by Husni Attiya al-Hijazi (recommending
Abdul Ghani-Naim and Ahmed Kindi as honest merchants), a request for
perfume and advice from Jaber al-Ayashi of the royal court of Sharif
Hussein to Baghdad to warn of robbers in the desert. "This is just to give
you our advice for which you will be highly rewarded," Ayashi says. "If you
don't take our advice, then we have warned you." A touch of Saddam
there, I thought. The date was 1912.

Some of the documents list the cost of bullets, military horses and
artillery for Ottoman armies in Baghdad and Arabia, others record the
opening of the first telephone exchange in the Hejaz ­ soon to be Saudi
Arabia ­ while one recounts, from the village of Azrak in modern-day
Jordan, the theft of clothes from a camel train by Ali bin Kassem, who
attacked his interrogators "with a knife and tried to stab them but was
restrained and later bought off". There is a 19th-century letter of
recommendation for a merchant, Yahyia Messoudi, "a man of the highest
morals, of good conduct and who works with the [Ottoman] government."
This, in other words, was the tapestry of Arab history ­ all that is left of it,
which fell into The Independent's hands as the mass of documents
crackled in the immense heat of the ruins.

King Faisal of the Hejaz, the ruler of Mecca, whose staff are the authors of
many of the letters I saved, was later deposed by the Saudis. His son
Faisel became king of Iraq ­ Winston Churchill gave him Baghdad after
the French threw him out of Damascus ­ and his brother Abdullah
became the first king of Jordan, the father of King Hussein and the
grandfather of the present-day Jordanian monarch, King Abdullah II.
For almost a thousand years, Baghdad was the cultural capital of the
Arab world, the most literate population in the Middle East. Genghis
Khan's grandson burnt the city in the 13th century and, so it was said, the
Tigris river ran black with the ink of books. Yesterday, the black ashes of
thousands of ancient documents filled the skies of Iraq. Why?

15 April 2003 09:48



To: Mephisto who wrote (6700)4/15/2003 1:09:35 PM
From: Mephisto  Respond to of 15516
 

"But for Iraq, this is Year Zero; with the destruction of
the antiquities in the Museum of Archaeology on Saturday
and the
burning of the National Archives and then the Koranic library, the cultural
identity of Iraq is being erased. Why? Who set these fires? For what
insane purpose is this heritage being destroyed? "

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

" And the Americans did nothing."

ARTICLE: Library
books, letters and
priceless documents are
set ablaze in final chapter
of the sacking of Baghdad

Author: Robert Fisk
Source: argument.independent.co.uk
15 April 2003
Message 18842999



To: Mephisto who wrote (6700)4/15/2003 6:36:38 PM
From: Mephisto  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 15516
 

It's U.S. Policy That's 'Untidy

latimes.com

Robert Scheer:

How telling that U.S. forces so carefully protected
Iraq's oil fields while ignoring the looting of Baghdad's
internationally renowned museum. The complete, and
by all accounts preventable, destruction of one of the
world's most significant collections of antiquities is a fit
metaphor for current U.S. foreign policy, which causes
more serious damage through carelessness than
calculation.


The notion that Iraq even has history -- let alone that
7,000 years ago this land was the cradle of civilization
-- is not likely to occur to the neocolonialists running a
brawny young nation barely more than 200 years old.

The United States' earnest innocence is the charm that
our entertainment industry markets so successfully
around the world, but it is also the perennial seed of
disaster as we blithely rearrange corners of the planet
we only pretend to understand.

To Donald Rumsfeld,
the widespread looting that has
ravaged hospitals, libraries and museums in Iraq was
simply further proof the U.S. invasion of this fractured
Muslim country represents liberation. "Freedom's
untidy," he said. "And free people are free to make
mistakes and commit crimes." Translation: You have to
break a few eggs to make an omelet.

It almost sounds as if the Defense secretary is
projecting onto the looters a blanket excuse for deadly
errors the White House and the U.S. military have
made and will continue to make in Iraq:
alienating
allies, killing civilians, handpicking craven and corrupt
Iraqi "leaders" who haven't been in the country for
decades. This is, after all, the distillation of the Bush
Doctrine: Free countries are free to commit mistakes
and commit crimes in unfree countries.

One wonders whether Rumsfeld would extend such tolerance to the United
States' own 2 million prisoners. Surely he would not dismiss our country's long
history of urban riots as an example of the untidiness of freedom? It is only in
Iraq that we believe, to quote a song Janis Joplin made famous, that "freedom is
just another word for nothing left to lose."

Yet neither the awesome display of U.S. military power or the slew of false
justifications used to unleash it -- the imminent threat of Iraq's use of weapons of
mass destruction, now likely to be proved nonexistent, or the unsubstantiated
claims that Iraq is linked to 9/11 -- qualifies the U.S. to remake a nation with
which we have absolutely no affinity.


If Iraq needs a foreign midwife to assist in its rebirth it should be under the
broader sponsorship of the United Nations Security Council, which our macho
president continues to disparage for having failed to vote our way. Will the
democracy we so glibly promote for Iraq be pushed aside if it similarly fails to
produce results to our liking?

Eager to rebuild their country after years of misrule, will Iraqis really swallow the
shameless plans of Bush insiders to privatize Iraqi oil while the administration
awards billions of dollars in contracts to U.S. companies?


And what if Iraqi Muslim fundamentalists prove as successful at the polls as
radicals in Algeria, where the U.S. only mildly rebuked a repressive regime for
smashing a popularly elected but theocratic opposition?

If the new Iraq follows the path of Pakistan and Turkey, where the populace is
inclined to obliterate any wall between state and church, will the U.S. spin this as
a victory for democracy? Will Rumsfeld justify the ethnic cleansing common in a
nation riven with competing tribes, clans and religious sects arbitrarily packed
together by previous colonialist rulers as the unruly joy of freedom?

Why have the media bought the administration's propaganda that we come to
Iraq with clean hands and virgin swords to slay the dragon of Saddam Hussein,
when the U.S. did so much to keep him in power? Surely, even embedded
journalists recall that it was Reagan administration special envoy Rumsfeld who
met with Hussein in the 1980s to guarantee U.S. support for Iraq's war with
Iran.


Once again, we're deep in the "nation-building" game that Bush the candidate
railed against in 2000. Having blundered in, guns blazing, we should now play to
win the peace, slowly backing out and inviting a true multinational rebuilding
effort with support from the U.N. and Muslim countries.

And for heaven's sake, can we remember in our next preemptive invasion to
assign at least a few of our tanks to protect the hospitals and museums?


latimes.com



To: Mephisto who wrote (6700)4/17/2003 12:49:48 PM
From: Mephisto  Respond to of 15516
 
Experts' pleas to Pentagon didn't save Iraq's national museum



By Douglas Jehl and Elizabeth Becker, New York Times

WASHINGTON - The plunder last week of Iraq's national museum,
one of the Middle East's most important archaeological repositories,
occurred despite repeated requests to the Pentagon by experts
and scholars that the site be protected when American troops entered Baghdad.


A senior Pentagon official said the military had never promised that the buildings would be safeguarded.

"We could never guarantee ahead of time the safety of a single building," said Dr. Joseph Collins, a deputy assistant
secretary of defense for humanitarian and peacekeeping operations.

But experts, including McGuire Gibson, a professor at the Oriental Institute
at the University of Chicago, said they
believed that the military had understood the need to protect the
buildings against looting as well as bombing.


"I thought we had understandings," Dr. Gibson said today as he prepared to leave for a meeting of antiquities experts
in Paris called by Unesco to assess the damage from the museum's destruction. "I didn't expect that we would stand by
and let them loot the museum and burn the ministries."

The experts met with Pentagon officials as early as January to warn that the impending war could pose grave risks to
Iraq's archaeological treasures. They renewed the warnings in e-mail messages in the days before the American attack
on Baghdad began, some of the experts said today.

Representatives of the American Council for Cultural Policy, a New York-based group of museum officials and
prominent art collectors, also met with Defense and State Department officials in the months before the war, and said
they were encouraged by the meetings.

At the Pentagon, defense officials said that the museum had in fact been put on the American military's no-target list
in response to the scholars' warnings, and that the military had refrained from bombing it.

But in an e-mail message, Mr. Collins said that "in no case" had his office instructed military commanders to provide
protection for the museum or library.

"We leave such decisions to commanders on the scene," he said.

In interviews, the experts said their warnings had addressed the dangers posed by looting as well as by aerial attack.

Dr. Gibson, a leading expert on Iraqi antiquities, said he met in January with Mr. Collins, whose office was responsible
for helping determine which sites could not be bombed.

But Gen. Richard Myers, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said at a Pentagon briefing today that the protection of
the museum had been assigned less importance than the combat operations that were continuing sporadically in
Baghdad last Thursday and Friday while the museum was being looted.

"It's as much as anything else a matter of priorities," General Myers said when asked whether the military had made a
mistake in failing to defend the museum.

In other parts of Iraq, American forces followed the military's plan to to secure oil wells, dams and other critical sites
ahead of the troops' main advance, and in Baghdad they secured at least the oil ministry and kept looters at bay.

But they did not try to guard the National Museum either before or during most of the two days after Iraq's own
security apparatus collapsed, defense officials acknowledged today. In interviews in Baghdad, museum officials said
American troops came only once - for a half- hour at midday on Thursday.

In the absence of any security presence, the looters exacted what experts believe was a heavy toll on the museum and
its collection, stored in 28 galleries and vaults, including the loss of perhaps 50,000 irreplaceable artifacts and the
burning of museum records.

"You'd have to go back centuries, to the Mongol invasion of Baghdad in 1258, to find looting on this scale," said
Eleanor Robson, a fellow of All Souls College, Oxford, and a council member of the British School of Archeology in
Iraq, a semiofficial scholarly institution.

British scholars asked Prime Minister Tony Blair as early as last December to protect Iraq's museums and historical
sites against looting and destruction. In particular, the scholars were worried by the precedent set following the gulf
war in 1991, when 9 of Iraq's 13 regional museums were ransacked and their treasures were sold on the international
art market.

They said they suspected that professional thieves were behind the looting of Baghdad's museum and library.

Archaeological officials in Baghdad took reporters through the museum today and pointed to what they said was clear
evidence of professionalism on the part of some looters: the use of glass cutters, the bypassing of reproductions in
favor of valuable originals and the carting off of major pieces weighing hundreds of pounds.

Dr. Gibson said he and other experts issued warnings in two meetings at the Pentagon in January and February.

"Maybe I just wasn't talking to people high enough in the organization," he said.

"I got nothing in writing," he acknowledged.

At the Pentagon today, Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld defended the military's approach.

"To try to pass off the fact of that unfortunate activity to a deficit in the war plan strikes me as a stretch," Mr. Rumsfeld
told a reporter who asked whether the looting of the museum reflected a military mistake.

Pentagon officials said today that the military was working closely with scholars at the University of Chicago and
other institutions to identify missing pieces and to provide photographs of them to American troops. The hope is that
forces now guarding Iraq's borders might be able to intercept at least some of the looted items before they are
smuggled out.

Less publicized is the damage to Iraq's main library, the House of Wisdom, the repository of the country's historical
archives, said Charles Tripp, a professor of Middle East politics at the School of Oriental and African Studies in
London.

"This is really a terrible thing for Iraq," he said. "One of the problems has been establishing an identity, a place in
history and in the future. If you lose those documents you are subject to remolding of history which will be extremely
dangerous."

While war and looting are synonymous, few scholars could remember such a spectacular loss in recent times. When
Vietnam invaded Cambodia and overthrew Pol Pot in January 1979, there was virtually no looting of ancient Khmer
art or manuscripts. During World War II, the Allies changed their military strategy to avoid fighting inside Florence,
Italy.

Langdon Warner, a Harvard archaeologist, is a hero in Japan for persuading the Air Force to spare the ancient cities of
Nara and Kyoto from firebomb raids that laid waste to other major Japanese cities in 1945. No such solicitude was
shown for Berlin or Dresden.

Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company

Reprinted from the New York Times:
nytimes.com



To: Mephisto who wrote (6700)4/17/2003 5:39:29 PM
From: Mephisto  Respond to of 15516
 

A Baghdad Art Center Left in Ashes

The New York Times

April 17, 2003

"She is convinced, for instance, that the bombing of her house, the
ransacking of her cultural center and the looting of the national
museum are evidence of an American plan to deface Iraq's culture
and carry its treasures out of the country.
This, from a graduate of London University, a professor who
taught the literature of Britain and France."

By DEXTER FILKINS

B AGHDAD, Iraq, April 16 - Amal al-Khedairy stood amid the
ruins of her elegant waterfront home and cursed the people who had rained the
bombs on her.

This was a full-throated, almost lunatic fury, sharpened
by the Western-educated voice that carried it. For years, Ms. Khedairy ran Baghdad's most
luminous artistic center, one that flourished in the face of the dictator,
a place dedicated to bringing the worlds of Occident and Orient together.

Today, in the rubble and shattered windows of Ms. Khedairy's home
and the ransacked remains of her cultural center, the aspiration seemed all
lost.

"This is our American liberation!" spat Ms. Khedairy, 70,
as she waded through the half-burned books of her second-story
library. "I never thought
you would do it. I went to the American School.
I believed in your moral values. And every night you bombed.

Every night, I ran through the streets,
an old woman in my nightgown. Look at my library!"

As this city of 4.5 million people grapples with
the destruction all around it, Ms. Khedairy's rage seems emblematic
of a whole class of people who
might be expected to be more sympathetic to the American cause.

Ms. Khedairy spent a lifetime admiring Western culture, learning its English,
conjugating its French verbs, all the while trying to sustain
her native culture in an Iraq under the iron fist of Saddam Hussein.

But somewhere, in the cacophony of bombs and the
orgy of looting that followed, Ms. Khedairy and, it seems,
others among Baghdad's cultural elite
became angry about the war, seeing in its destruction
a vulgarity that only pushed the country deeper into degradation.
Even today, even in
Baghdad, there are people unused to chaos,
and chaos now it is.


Ms. Khedairy's anger may seem odd in a country where people
were routinely tortured to death by Saddam Hussein. She is in fact a neophyte to
politics in a land where everything long ago became political,
and her anger is by no means confined to Americans.
She is equally angry with Iraqi looters.

But what seems clear in her confused emotions
is that the war has dragged her from a comfortable way of life under Mr. Hussein. Of the
compromises involved in that, she did not speak.
She had, she said, refused all invitations to join parties or committees.
Art and culture provided
her refuge during the Hussein years. But they were no
refuge against bombs and the chaos that followed, and so her anger spills over.

"I want you to come and see what they have done to my institute,"
she said to an American visitor, desperate, tugging. "It's all gone: the paintings,
the piano, the carpets, the music. All looted by these animals. Our liberation!"

Ms. Khedairy's house is in the Suleik neighborhood,
one of the Baghdad's wealthier enclaves, known for the intellectuals who inhabit it.

In a city of flat, squat buildings spare of trees and greenery,
her home is a luxurious island: two levels, floor-to-ceiling windows, a garden full of
jasmine and bougainvillea and date palms. The Tigris River meanders past her backyard.

The house is full of culture, or it was. There are recordings
of Beethoven and Wagner among the antiquated LP's, and collections of Turkish and
Arabian music as well. A handcrafted wooden grille forms
one of the walls of the sitting room, and the books range from Oriental architecture to
French literature.

But the house's curse, and Ms. Khedairy's, is its proximity to the
headquarters of the Mukhabarat, the Iraqi secret police, which lies just across the
river. Night and day, for weeks, the bombs fell here, most of them finding their target,
some of them not.

The result is that the entire back end of the house is splayed open to the world.
The windows are shattered, the rain has come in, and the LP's and
books have been blown apart and scattered.

For weeks, Ms. Khedairy said, she often left her house when the bombing
started, dashing to a friend's house blocks away, where she felt safer.
Every day, she said, she would return to her garden to water her palms and plants,
so determined was she to preserve something in the ruins.

This was not the first time Ms. Khedairy had returned to her home,
not the first time she had seen the wreckage. Perhaps it was the unexpected
entrance of an American into her home that set her emotions tumbling.
Today was the day of her rage: she ranted and wept amid the ruins of her
house, picking up a tattered book here, a record album there.

"We will kill them all one day, Rumsfeld and every one of them,"
she said, referring to Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld. "Look at what they
have done to my library."

Like many residents of Baghdad, Ms. Khedairy has now spun
any number of conspiracy theories about the intentions of the Americans. She is
convinced, for instance, that the bombing of her house, the
ransacking of her cultural center and the looting of the national museum are evidence of
an American plan to deface Iraq's culture and carry its treasures out of the country.
This, from a graduate of London University, a professor who
taught the literature of Britain and France.


Such theories are rampant even among the city's educated elite.
Today, for instance, the chief doctor at one of the Baghdad's larger hospitals spoke
about the presumed designs of the Americans on the Iraqi nation.

"Tell me," said the doctor, who asked that he not be identified,
"Why do the American troops allow the looting? These people are cowards, the
looters. All the soldiers have to do is fire one shot, and the looters will go away.
They are cowards. And the Americans do not do this. Why?"

Ms. Khedairy's neighborhood has not yet been looted, but she thinks the day is near
Since the bombing ended, a group of her neighbors has stood
guard over the houses, armed with guns, keeping the thieves away.
But the Americans have begun to move closer to the neighborhood, and Ms.
Khedairy is convinced that the looters will be allowed to roam freely through her home.

"They follow the tanks," Ms. Khedairy said. "The Americans
come in and they let the looters do as they wish. That is what they did at the museum.
That is what they did at my institute. My neighborhood is next."

Not all of Ms. Khedairy's anger is directed at foreigners;
she has saved a good deal for her fellow Iraqis. As she arrived at the steps of her cultural
center, she surprised a half dozen Iraqi men picking
over the last of the artifacts and paintings that had not been stolen.

"My God, I'll kill you!" she growled, and the young men
scampered out the door. In her anger, Ms. Khedairy picked up a piece of broken pottery and
hurled it into the back of one of the men. "How could this nation produce such sons?" she wailed.

The devastation wrought by the looters is indeed complete:
the books and sheet music lay scattered across the floor, the lamps and fans torn from
the ceiling. Upstairs, a recent exhibit of artwork by Iraqi and Japanese children lay in tatters.

Ms. Khedairy paused before a decorative wrought-iron door,
one of the few things left that still appeared intact. She fingered it, studied it, swung
the thing on its hinge.

"I will have to save this," she said, "before someone takes it."

nytimes.com
Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company |



To: Mephisto who wrote (6700)4/19/2003 9:17:03 AM
From: Mephisto  Respond to of 15516
 
Two quit to protest loss of Iraqi
treasures


PREVENTABLE DESTRUCTION'


By Paul Richard, Washington Post, 4/18/2003

ASHINGTON -- Citing ''the wanton and preventable
destruction'' of Iraq's National Museum of Antiquities, the
chairman of the President's Advisory Committee on Cultural
Property has submitted his resignation to President Bush.
Another of the committee's nine members is also resigning
over the issue.

''While our military
forces have
displayed
extraordinary
precision and
restraint in
deploying arms --
and apparently in
securing the Oil
Ministry and oil
fields -- they have
been nothing short
of impotent in
failing to attend to
the protection of
[Iraq's] cultural heritage,'' Martin Sullivan wrote in the
resignation letter that he sent Monday to the White House.


Sullivan, 59, has been chairman of the advisory committee
since 1995. The committee seeks to harmonize US import
regulations with the export restrictions of nations seeking to
protect their cultural patrimony. Acknowledging that his
successor would soon be named, Sullivan wrote, ''From a
practical perspective my resignation is simply symbolic.''

''The tragedy was foreseeable and preventable,'' wrote Sullivan,
who is also executive director of Historic St. Mary's City
Commission in Maryland. ''The tragedy was not prevented, due
to our nation's inaction.''

Asked about the looting of antiquities
at his press briefing Tuesday,
Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld
said: ''No one likes it. No one allows
it. It happens, and it's unfortunate. . .
. The United States is concerned
about the museum in Baghdad, and
the president and the secretary of
state and I have all talked about it,
and we are in the process of offering
rewards for people who will bring
things back or to assist us in finding
where those things might be.''

The second committee resignation
came from Gary Vikan, director of the
Walters Art Museum in Baltimore,
who called his action ''similarly
symbolic.''

Armies have been marching through
the Fertile Crescent for several
millennia, and Baghdad has been
sacked before. ''But it hasn't been
this bad for 700 years,'' said Vikan.

When the Mongols attacked in 1258
they put to the sword most of the
city's inhabitants. It is said that so
many manuscripts from Baghdad's
unequaled libraries were hurled into
the Tigris that the river ran black
with ink.

Many provincial museums and Iraqi
archeological sites were also looted
during the 1991 Gulf War.

With this history in mind, Richard
Moe, president of the National Trust
for Historic Preservation, wrote to
Secretary of State Colin Powell to
urge the United States to ''safeguard''
the ''collection of the National
Museum of Iraq.''

Wednesday, on behalf of the National
Trust, Moe wrote again, this time to
Rumsfeld, to ''strongly urge the
Coalition Forces to take full
responsibility for safeguarding Iraq's
remaining museum collections and
monuments.''

''Officials at UNESCO estimate that
about 150,000 items, with a total
value in the billions of dollars,
[already] have been taken,'' Moe
wrote. ''Losses include 4,000-year-old
Sumerian gold jewelry,
5,000-year-old tablets with some of
the world's earliest known writing,
and thousands of other objects.''

The United Nations cultural
organization, UNESCO, was
convening a meeting of European and
American antiquities experts
yesterday in Paris to discuss the
losses. UNESCO is also sending a
team to Baghdad to assess the
damage. Meanwhile, an anonymous
British benefactor has agreed to pay
for six conservators and three
curators to start work restoring
damaged artifacts as soon as it is
safe.

This story ran on page A24 of the Boston Globe on 4/18/2003.
© Copyright 2003 Globe Newspaper Company.



To: Mephisto who wrote (6700)4/19/2003 9:19:29 AM
From: Mephisto  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 15516
 
Bush and Rummy protected the oil ministry in Baghdad from bombs and looting, according to the news last night but they wouldn't protect the country's culture.



To: Mephisto who wrote (6700)4/19/2003 9:21:32 AM
From: Mephisto  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 15516
 
Two quit to protest loss of Iraqi
treasures


PREVENTABLE DESTRUCTION'

Two quit to protest loss of Iraqi
treasures

By Paul Richard, Washington Post, 4/18/2003

ASHINGTON -- Citing ''the wanton and preventable
destruction'' of Iraq's National Museum of Antiquities, the
chairman of the President's Advisory Committee on Cultural
Property has submitted his resignation to President Bush.
Another of the committee's nine members is also resigning
over the issue.

''While our military
forces have
displayed
extraordinary
precision and
restraint in
deploying arms --
and apparently in
securing the Oil
Ministry and oil
fields -- they have
been nothing short
of impotent in
failing to attend to
the protection of
[Iraq's] cultural heritage,'' Martin Sullivan wrote in the
resignation letter that he sent Monday to the White House.

Sullivan, 59, has been chairman of the advisory committee
since 1995. The committee seeks to harmonize US import
regulations with the export restrictions of nations seeking to
protect their cultural patrimony. Acknowledging that his
successor would soon be named, Sullivan wrote, ''From a
practical perspective my resignation is simply symbolic.''

''The tragedy was foreseeable and preventable,'' wrote Sullivan,
who is also executive director of Historic St. Mary's City
Commission in Maryland. ''The tragedy was not prevented, due
to our nation's inaction.''

Asked about the looting of antiquities
at his press briefing Tuesday,
Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld
said: ''No one likes it. No one allows
it. It happens, and it's unfortunate. . .
. The United States is concerned
about the museum in Baghdad, and
the president and the secretary of
state and I have all talked about it,
and we are in the process of offering
rewards for people who will bring
things back or to assist us in finding
where those things might be.''

The second committee resignation
came from Gary Vikan, director of the
Walters Art Museum in Baltimore,
who called his action ''similarly
symbolic.''

Armies have been marching through
the Fertile Crescent for several
millennia, and Baghdad has been
sacked before. ''But it hasn't been
this bad for 700 years,'' said Vikan.

When the Mongols attacked in 1258
they put to the sword most of the
city's inhabitants. It is said that so
many manuscripts from Baghdad's
unequaled libraries were hurled into
the Tigris that the river ran black
with ink.

Many provincial museums and Iraqi
archeological sites were also looted
during the 1991 Gulf War.

With this history in mind, Richard
Moe, president of the National Trust
for Historic Preservation, wrote to
Secretary of State Colin Powell to
urge the United States to ''safeguard''
the ''collection of the National
Museum of Iraq.''

Wednesday, on behalf of the National
Trust, Moe wrote again, this time to
Rumsfeld, to ''strongly urge the
Coalition Forces to take full
responsibility for safeguarding Iraq's
remaining museum collections and
monuments.''

''Officials at UNESCO estimate that
about 150,000 items, with a total
value in the billions of dollars,
[already] have been taken,'' Moe
wrote. ''Losses include 4,000-year-old
Sumerian gold jewelry,
5,000-year-old tablets with some of
the world's earliest known writing,
and thousands of other objects.''

The United Nations cultural
organization, UNESCO, was
convening a meeting of European and
American antiquities experts
yesterday in Paris to discuss the
losses. UNESCO is also sending a
team to Baghdad to assess the
damage. Meanwhile, an anonymous
British benefactor has agreed to pay
for six conservators and three
curators to start work restoring
damaged artifacts as soon as it is
safe.

This story ran on page A24 of the Boston Globe on 4/18/2003.
© Copyright 2003 Globe Newspaper Company.