Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: reaper who wrote (236160)	4/17/2003 12:42:29 PM
From: benwood	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

Speaking of Boone, just out of curiosity, how much more money would one make if they took performance-enhancing drugs to beef up at just the right time, say, the final year of a contract, so that their bargaining position could look that much stronger for signing a new multi-year contract, assuming that person generated an outlier season of epic proportions. Supposin' that person knew it was bad for his health and only did this one year; would their next year be much worse again, but with the guaranteed contract in place, would it matter? And would the Player's Union oppose drug testing because that would lead to lower contracts and hence lower union dues? Just wondering if they would really put health and integrity over lining their own pockets. Of course, if they did, they'd fit right in to our system, wouldn't they?