SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (94254)4/17/2003 7:16:14 PM
From: Maurice Winn  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 281500
 
<I think the Marines should take her on a tour of Saddam's dungeons, and let her try out her attitude on some newly released prisoners. Especially from the prison for children. >

Nadine, That would be more persuasive than the pointing of a barrel of a gun at her, which was apparently done. Why point a gun if not considering shooting? Why consider shooting her, who was obviously unarmed and harmless? Soldiers are notoriously tough when confronting unarmed civilians, women etc.

Pointing a gun at her is confirming for her that while Saddam's torture chambers might be horrific, the incoming invaders are showing the same stripe. They'll use brutal force or the threat of it to get their way.

Anyway, Saddam's stuff is history. All that matters now is whether the incoming bosses do okay. Pointing guns at unarmed women is very nasty and bullying. The fact is that the USA troops did kill children, so her sign was correct.

Mqurice



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (94254)4/17/2003 7:57:35 PM
From: JohnM  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
Not everything needs to be weighted in a scale which says its ok to do this or that because it would have been worse to have Saddam hanging around. The woman has convictions and she has the courage of them. Nuff said.