Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Israel to U.S. : Now Deal with Syria and Iran -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (35)	4/19/2003 11:27:02 AM
From: Emile Vidrine	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 22250

The Mitchell plan and the Saudi Arabian proposal of two years ago are almost identical to your plan except for enforcement and the internationalization of Jerusalem. The Saudi Plan only called for divided Jerusalem.

To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (35)	4/19/2003 11:58:12 AM
From: Thomas M.	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 22250

And what will you say when the Arabs also reject it? It is flagrantly dishonest to suggest that "the Arabs" will reject it. "The Arabs" have accepted your peace plan (UN 242) long ago. Note that this peace plan gives 75% of the land to Israel and 25% of the land to the Palestinians, even though the populations are roughly 50/50, and the Palestinians were obviously there first. In 1971, Egypt proposed it, and Israel rejected it. In 1976, the PLO brought it before the UN, with the backing of all the Arab states (and the entire world). The U.S. vetoed it. This has continued for 3 decades. Most recently, a year ago, the Arab League formally proposed it again. Israel rejected again. In fact, we could go a step further, and look at Camp David 2000. In the last round of talks (at Taba) the Palestinians essentially agreed to a deal that is even WORSE than the one you propose. The official Israeli statement at that point was: " The two sides declare that they have never been closer to reaching an agreement and it is thus our shared belief that the remaining gaps could be bridged with the resumption of negotiations following the Israeli elections." Israel did not return to the table after having broken off the talks. Tom