SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: American Spirit who wrote (395243)4/20/2003 4:21:58 AM
From: jjkirk  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 769667
 
Commentary: Why a Liberal Supports Bush's War
By Jeffrey Scott Shapiro

Two years ago I voted for Vice President Al Gore in the 2000 presidential
election. Upon George W. Bush's ascension into the White House, I found
myself furious with him and vowed I would do whatever I could to campaign
for the next future Democratic presidential candidate in 2004.

Today, I am convinced that Bush may go down in history as one of America's
greatest presidents.

There's an old saying - a man doesn't make history - history makes the man.
Nothing could be truer in the presidency of George W. Bush. When our
enemies struck us in the heart and soul of our nation, we mourned. And when
we realized that nearly 3000 of our fellow American brothers and sisters were
murdered, we cried.

But when our president set foot upon the crumbled steel and shattered glass
of the World Trade Center, he reminded us of our greatness and we cheered.
It was at that moment, that this young Texas governor truly became the
President of the United States and won the mandate and the hearts of the
American people.

In the wake of Sept. 11, only one country had the audacity not to lower its
embassy flag to half-mast. Expressing no sense of compassion, offering no
words of support, Iraq flew its flag high and mighty as it's black and white
stripes and emboldened green stars waved proudly in the New York City wind.

Since Sept. 11, the president has tried to make a case to the American
people that our nation must remove Saddam Hussein from power. Although he
convinced Congress, he failed to win the popular momentum of the American
people and the world community. Forced to contend with an ineffective
United Nations that refused to enforce its own resolutions, the president
moved forward with the support of only a few democratic allies.

Now, recent polls show that America's feelings on the war have changed. In
fact, most television news networks now report that over 75 percent of the
nation supports the war. Perhaps the proof that the president was right came
when the first Iraqi citizens encountering U.S. Marines refused to fire guns
but instead threw up their hands and cheered for America.

Yet despite this wave of happiness and relief sweeping through southern Iraq,
my fellow liberal Democrats still contend the war is wrong. They argue that
the liberation of Iraq is unjustified. Street protesters cry out that our aim is
to seize oil instead of freeing innocent people who have suffered under the
iron rule of a sadistic dictator.

Allow me to respond: How could you? How could you be so cowardly? How
can you portray yourselves as the champions of human rights yet lack the
courage to do anything about it? Are you so afraid of conflict that you lack
the conviction to stand before the world and denounce evil even when it
exists in its most pure form? Do you not see the torture and heartbreak of a
nation in despair? Do you care? Can you not put party politics aside and
support our president in this unified struggle for freedom?

According to the Foreign & Commonwealth Office of London report on Saddam
Hussein's Crimes and Human Rights Abuses, the Iraqi regime has openly
engaged in state-licensed rape, acid baths, electric shock, eye gouging, the
piercing of hands with electric drills and mock executions. Families whose
members betray Saddam are forced to watch their sisters, daughters and
wives raped repeatedly by soldiers whose professional job is to "violate a
woman's honor." Those who openly condemn Saddam Hussein have their
tongues cut from their mouths so they can never speak again.

Citizens held captive in the Mahjar prison in Baghdad are beaten twice a day
and women are regularly raped by their guards. Those locked in the prison's
underground are kept in rows of rectangular steel boxes roughly the size of a
coffin until they either confess or die. The boxes are opened only for one hour
a day and prisoners are fed only liquids to stay alive.

The human rights abuses perpetuated by Saddam Hussein and his regime go
beyond the pale of cruelty. They are inhumane, incomprehensible and
criminal. How can we, as Americans let such cruelty stand? Should we cower
away at the fear of losing troops and surrender our resolve because we are
without a quick and painless victory?

Think for a moment what America would be like today if President Lincoln had
hesitated to send Union troops to free the slaves in the south. The Civil War
was long and harsh, costing our nation the lives of hundreds of thousands.
Yet, by challenging the Confederacy, Lincoln completed the next stage of the
American Revolution and ended the diabolical institution of slavery.

I can think of no other place more sacred in this country than the temple we
call the Lincoln Memorial. I will never forget how I felt as a child when I first
gazed up at the marble frame of President Lincoln as he sat silently on his
throne. It was a spiritual feeling I had never felt before in my life and it is
something that I will never forget.

Although slavery has been abolished in America it still exists in many dark
corners of the globe. Iraq is one of those places.

In the wake of Iraq's misery, one man rose above all others and said there
would be no more. Many people listened to the cries of human rights
organizations across the globe, but only one man did anything about it. Like
President Lincoln before him, one man put the cause of freedom above himself
and his political career. One man chose to liberate the people of Iraq when
the world condemned him for it. One man initiated the next frontier of the
American Revolution because he knew that revolution will not be over until
every human being on this planet is free.

War is a necessary function of freedom. Those who enslave others must be
forced to step down from their despotic positions of power. They will not
simply relinquish it. Although it was unpopular to do so, President Bush had
the heart to do the right thing. He took action. He sent troops to free
innocent people. He knew what it was to truly love humanity, and for that,
the president has my admiration and respect. More importantly, he now has
my vote.

Jeffrey Scott Shapiro is an investigative reporter who covered the Sept. 11
attacks in New York City. He is now studying law at the University of Florida
and can be reached at jbsavenger@aol.com.

Insight on the News - Fair Comment
Issue: 04/29/03
insightmag.com



To: American Spirit who wrote (395243)4/20/2003 1:50:26 PM
From: J_F_Shepard  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769667
 
"My guess is the Bush wars are over and so is most of the war on terrorism"

Probably so, but he will demagogue the issue right thru the election.....



To: American Spirit who wrote (395243)4/20/2003 2:04:38 PM
From: SeachRE  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769667
 
WRONG!!! Bush has shown he's ready to fight anyone, anytime, anywhere. Get with the program, babe!