Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : SARS and Avian Flu -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Cogito Ergo Sum who wrote (409)	4/23/2003 9:53:20 PM
From: RealMuLan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4232

Edit, I am not sure. maybe others, like Condor<g>, or other professionals, like Peter, can tell you.

To: Cogito Ergo Sum who wrote (409)	4/23/2003 11:25:26 PM
From: Biomaven	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4232

Wasn't the virus decoded in the US different albeit slightly? Message 18871618 I doubt if these small differences account for the missing virus in the Canadian study. My guess is that the throat swab they took, at the particular time they took it, just didn't contain any virus. My view is that when this latest dust settles it will be seen that the coronavirus is indeed the cause of SARS. Peter Peter