To: LPS5 who wrote (228 ) 4/25/2003 12:51:55 AM From: Don Earl Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 20039 <<<That's a "neat little package"?>>> IMO, that's about as neat as it can get and cover the facts. I don't how much information on the topic you've gotten into, but there is a ton of stuff that doesn't fit together any other way that I can come up with. 1. Rumsfeld & Co. were lobbying for a war against Iraq as early as 1998. James Baker of Carlyle Group, in conjunction with a hoard of energy concerns, issued a report in early 2001 which outlined taking control of Iraqi oil reserves. 2. A whole bunch of people who shouldn't have been able to enter the United States, were allowed to enter the United States, and any investigations into their activities were prohibited. 3. A lot of Israelis were tipped off the day of the show to avoid the area, as well as Pentagon officials who cancelled travel plans, and CEOs of businesses in the building were invited to functions elsewhere. Plus an Israeli company with 200 employees in the buildings moved out less than 2 weeks earlier. 4. Security at the two airports was controlled by an Israeli company, and security on the day of the show was inexcusably lax, as was the response time to the hijackings. 5. The debris field from Flight 93 shows the plane was breaking up well before the crash, the black box on the flight stopped recording several minutes before the crash, and a cell phone report of one of the victims states hearing explosions several minutes before the crash. The exact time of impact is pinpointed by seismic data. Numerous eyewitness accounts report sightings of an unmarked jet flying below radar range in the vicinity of Flight 93 before the crash. 6. All three towers imploded in a manner consistent with a controlled demolition. 7. The anthrax in the letters was analyzed as being from Ft. Detrick, and members of the Bush administration began taking medication to prevent infection a week before the first letters were mailed. 8. Numerous Israelis illegally in the US were rounded up and deported after the attacks, and many of them were identified as Mossad. 9. Evidence from the WTC was destroyed and no competent investigation was allowed to proceed. 10. To this day the cover up continues and no competent, independent investigation is being allowed by the Bush administration. Those are the facts I believe any explanation has to account for. I'm completely open to suggestions if you have other ideas that give a different or better fit. Both Bush and Sharon have demonstrated a capacity to sacrifice innocent persons in order to achieve their goals. I don't think it's the explanation most people find hard to accept after viewing the evidence, it's the degree of evil involved in the act itself that is next to impossible for anyone with a hint of morals to believe could exist. At a certain level I don't think the average person has yet come to terms with the fact the WTC was intentionally destroyed and thousands of innocent people lost their lives as a result. Once you get past the emotional sticking point that evil on that level shouldn't exist, you have to get down to means, motive and opportunity. A boogieman living in a cave in Afghanistan doesn't cover the facts.