SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Raymond Duray who wrote (325)4/27/2003 6:20:15 AM
From: ChrisJP  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 20039
 
Ray and Don -- the problem is -- for a conspiracy theory to be believed .....

there can't be just a few holes or lingering questions --

EVERY ASPECT of the event needs to be questionable.

1. Why did jets scramble for the hijacked Boston planes within minutes of being notified ?

2. Why did the WTC attacks only kill something like 2000 people when usually 50,000 people work there ?

3. Why did the DC attack hit the most solid building in Washington DC, the ONLY SECTION to have been recently renovated -- not only strengthened, but also empty ? By the way -- the Pentagon Brass offices are on the opposite side facing the Potomac River.

4. Why was Osama bin Laden telling people "Wait, there's more" after the 1st plane hit the WTC ?

5. Under what administration did the hi-jackers enter the country and begin operating ? Hint: It was before the 2000 election.

6. Why was the order given to evacuate the White House and Old Executive Office building minutes before the plane hit the Pentagon ? Women were told to take their heeled shoes off so they could get as much distance between them and the buildings in what little time they had.

7. Why did authoritizes and the news tell us there were as many as 6 possible hijacked planes -- with at least one that might make DC its target -- resulting in the immediate evacuation of Washington DC (after the plane hit the Pentagon) ? Why not just tell everyone "That was it, show's over" after the 1st plane hit ?

So you see -- we could play this game indefinitely.

Regarding Iraq -- yessss the Bush Administration's attempts to convince the public that Saddam needed to go were extremely lame.

But as it turns out -- our policy to get rid of him and Osama by any means possible dates back to 1998 -- under the Clinton Administration.

Chris



To: Raymond Duray who wrote (325)4/27/2003 3:16:54 PM
From: space (Hijacked)  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 20039
 
Ray,

So many questions remain unanswered. You have listed but a few. As an American, Chris and others like him should encourage a thorough investigation by a third party. We owe it to those who lost their lives; we owe it to their families; and, we owe it to ourselves. If the investigation confirms the official version then so be it. At least we won't be left a divided people we doubts about our government for years to come.