SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stop the War! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sojourner Smith who wrote (16043)4/27/2003 10:03:54 PM
From: epicure  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 21614
 
There is another argument- that the US did not really need to stop the Iraqis, because their WMD or chemical weapons (what little was left, if left), posed no threat to us. We knew, when we supported Iran in the Iran/Iraq conflict that they were using gas. We knew when Rummy was kissing Saddam that they gassed the Kurds. But Iran never made a move against us, with or without WMDS. Of course you can conjecture all sorts of things- but rational people often prefer to see evidence. And there isn't much hard evidence that Saddam was planning much of anything against us.



To: Sojourner Smith who wrote (16043)4/28/2003 7:28:58 PM
From: 49thMIMOMander  Respond to of 21614
 
< The UN clearly documents that the Saddam had a bio/chem program and used them.>

Care to give a specification of at least some time interval??

Or should the same apply to all within that nonexisting time-interval

Throwing carcasses over the city walls, dumping them in wells, domestic posession
of both AIDS and SARS as well as some old cans of botulin?? Fuzzy propaganda??


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News