Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: fingolfen who wrote (174269)	4/28/2003 7:48:14 PM
From: carl a. mehr	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

U must be in the Fold, and not in the Cold. Did I guess right?...humble carl

To: fingolfen who wrote (174269)	4/28/2003 9:05:19 PM
From: Road Walker	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

fin, re: but looking at the individual grants, they aren't anything like what I've seen from other companies. You may be right. Specific examples? John

To: fingolfen who wrote (174269)	4/29/2003 2:20:59 AM
From: hueyone	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

they aren't anything like what I've seen from other companies. Should have nothing to do with it. Pay should be related to performance of the company. But typically management hires compensation consultant firms who make their money by spinning justifications for high compensation numbers. The joke is that the consultants can usually spin a rationale to pay execs in the 75 percentile, but in trying to pay all the execs in the 75 percentile it sets off a mathematical impossiblity marked by continual escalalating compensation. Regards, Huey