Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : The Boxing Ring Revived -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (6047)	4/29/2003 4:35:16 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7720

feel free to contribute or further define the list...

To: Neocon who wrote (6047)	4/29/2003 4:42:42 PM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 7720

I would hope that a strong woman would share most of them in some form. I would not think the characteristics a strong woman would be appreciably different from those of a strong man, not at all. Why would they need to be different? I think Jewel and I were doing different things. I wasn't trying to define a strong male. He seemed distressed about what feminism had done to men. I responded that I think that men are better now. My descriptors were in the context of comparing the male model now with the pre-feminist one, not defining maleness or strength. There seems to be some implication out there that men have been weakened by feminism and that has not been my perception. I think it's all for the better--better for both men and women that we've abandoned the model of the fifties.