Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stop the War! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: zonder who wrote (16399)	5/1/2003 1:38:15 PM
From: TigerPaw	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21614

Bush claimed he won the election too. That doesn't make it true. TP

To: zonder who wrote (16399)	5/2/2003 4:07:39 AM
From: Vitas	Respond to of 21614

It makes no difference whether you include or exclude resolutions before 687. Resolution 687 is incorporated by reference in Resolution 1441 and 687 authorizes the use of force. In addition, "The UN Charter doesn’t say the Security Council must explicitly authorize force, said Scott." The question is moot at this point anyway. While you were having multiple contortions about the war it is over and done with. As long as the coalition had tenable grounds for acting there is no way of holding them liable now.