Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sully- who wrote (257)	5/2/2003 5:23:58 PM
From: JohnM	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793966

I gather you've decided you can't find a reliable context for that last quote so you dig up all the old stuff. No one, least of all me, is arguing about Byrd's past. It's well known. I gather the point of the right wing's aggravation was that they felt what Byrd said recently was at least the equivalent of Lott's transgression. I'm only saying I would need to read the context, as reported by a reliable source, before I could come to some conclusion of my own. If that's what you are taunting me about. As for Lott, we need not think his undoing reflected noble motives from the Reps. If ever there were a case of mixed motives, that was one.