Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LindyBill who wrote (97657)	5/8/2003 5:13:02 PM
From: Sun Tzu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

What I was getting at is not politically correct. But I don't think it is reasonable to remain locked in policies that have their roots in the cold war. As undesirable as losing South Korea to NK would be, it would not be a national threat anymore. Hypothetically speaking, if North Korea can be fully disarmed, I'd be willing to consider letting them take over SK. The motivation here is that I don't see Russia or China arming them with intercontinental missiles pointing at us. And having the entire population of SK inside the NK regime may be the best way to bring them down...this is of course just a thought (and not fully considered at that) But little countries turning communist without any connection to a much greater soviet threat does not concern me as much.