Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : SI vs. iHub - Battle of the Boards Part 2 -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mmmary who wrote (4426)	5/9/2003 1:30:55 PM
From: David Lawrence	Respond to of 5315

First, you don't know that it's a lie. I gave an opinion, just as you did with "They will probably clear him of other allegations as well." You have no basis for that other than wishful thinking. Secondly, as to what scams he perpetrated on others, he plead guilty to insurance fraud. Or, is his own admission of guilt not good enough for you? And, why did he need to exchange testimony for immunity in the stock promotion kickback case if he was guiltless? So, he has a proven willingness to violate the law, and now he is once again charged with fraud, not to mention racketeering, extortion and obstruction of justice. And, you think he will be cleared. Who is desperate? I'll give you one thing: You are charitable with your trust, misplaced though it is.