SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (405053)5/11/2003 5:40:37 PM
From: Thomas A Watson  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
Yes the stupid thinkers at the New York times are ignorant about just about everything. The only reason America eliminated the regime of saddam is that it was determined that it presented a clear and present danger to America. A variety of factors contributed to that conclusion. One was that the UN had identified all that stuff you cited and Iraq had not accounted for it as they were directed to under UN resolution 1441. It was clear from current intelligence provided that Iraq was not really cooperating with blix and the boys. The fact that two trailers whose purpose was to have a potable WMD manufacturing capability proves to any reasonable person that the assertion the Iraq was not cooperating with blix and the boys was 100% true.

Iraq may or may not have destroyed some or all of the material cited. Some or all may have been destroyed before, just before or during the genius execution of saddam eradication. To any reasonable person and in particular to all who are not total technology ignoramuses, the reasonableness of the conclusion that Iraq presented a clear and present danger is crystal clear.

The total technology ignoramus crowd and the generally stupid just can't handle truth.



To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (405053)5/12/2003 9:32:04 AM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
Hey stupid.....where do you think they got those numbers....????

Those figures are the amounts documented by UN inspectors prior to being forced out of the country....

You really are a moron.....



To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (405053)5/12/2003 9:40:16 AM
From: Bald Eagle  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 769670
 
RE:Iraq fired no weapons of mass destruction

Might have had something to do with 150 special forces from Australia, aided by US troops being dropped into Iraq a couple of days ahead of the invasion to disable all the SCUD missiles.



To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (405053)5/12/2003 11:21:35 AM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 769670
 
BTW, just suppose that Bush outsmarted the French, Germans, Russians and Saddam as he has done so many times with the demolib pinhead leadership.

Suppose that allowing UN inspectors into Iraq was part of the strategy.....causing Saddam to disassemble and bury those weapons deep to avoid detection by the UN .......and to significantly reduce the possibility that they COULD be used to hinder the liberation of Iraq.....

And I love the flap over Bush's flight suit.....the more the demolibs whine....the more those pictures get shown and the more the demolibs keep focused on playing to GWB's strength.....

hehehehehehehehe