SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : History's effect on Religion -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sun Tzu who wrote (124)5/13/2003 8:04:13 AM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 520
 
I would argue Paul lived too early to be influenced by Mithraism. His Christian ministry went from about 40-60 something AD. The earliest mention of Mithraism in the Roman Empire is by Plutarch writing about the end of the first century. Furthermore, (see below) there are no archeological evidences of Mithraism in the Roman Empire before the end of the of the first century.

...it must be borne in mind that the historian wrote his life of Pompey at the end of first century A.D. and it is not until then that we actually find in Rome the characteristic representation of Mithras as bull-slayer. The poet Statius (A.D. 80) describes Mithras as one who 'twists the unruly horns beneath the rocks of a Persian cave'. One other point worthy of note is that no Mithraic monument can be dated earlier than the end of the first century A.D., and even the extensive investigations at Pompey, buried beneath the ashes of Vesuvius in A.D. 79, have not so far produced a single image of the god. There is therefore a complete gap in our knowledge between 67 B.C. and A.D. 79. The earliest datable monument is a statue from Rome, now in the British Museum; the inscription mentions a certain Alcimus, who calls himself the servant of T. Claudius Livianus, and, if the identification of this Livianus with the commander of the Praetorian Guard under the emperor Trajan is correct, then the figure must date from the beginning of the second century A.D. From this period onwards, the trail blazed by Mithras is broad and clear; the god's cult becomes firmly established and traces are found even on the Capitol and the Palatine, the heart of Imperial Rome.

Abstracted from : Mithras, the Secret God, M.J. Vermaseren, London, 1963

farvardyn.com

So it seems clear that even the Roman variety of Mithraism had parted ways with Greek doctorines and believed in heaven, hell, resurection, breath of god, wine and bread as the blood and flesh of the god, and so on. These are very drastic departures from the traditional Roman beliefs in which everyone went to hell and there was no resurection.

The Pharisees (dating back to Ezra and Nehemiah - who were agents of the Persian kings) introduced the Zoroastrian ideas of the afterlife into Judaism. The belief in angels and demons as well. There is a theory that Pharisee may be derived from Pars/Fars. Zoroastrianism-style eschatological ideas also entered Judaism as can be evidenced by the Essene's Dead Sea Scrolls.

The Qumran Scrolls reveal a variety of scenarios for the end of days, the best known one perhaps, is the Scroll called, the War of the Sons of Light against the Sons of Darkness. And at some point there will be a major battle, a cataclysmic struggle, not just between people, but also between cosmic forces, the cosmic forces of evil and the cosmic forces of good.
pbs.org

The translation of Mithraism into Christianity is demonstrated in Paul's Epistle to the Hebrews, Chapter 9, verses 13 and 14: 13 "For if the blood of bulls and of goats, and the ashes of an heifer sprinkling the unclean, sanctifieth to the purifying of the flesh: 14 How much more shall the blood of Christ, who through the eternal Spirit offered himself without spot to God, purge your conscience from dead works to serve the living God?"

This is to say, "If goat's blood will get you some spiritual energy, then the blood of a messiah will get you even more." Paul is reasoning with blood-sacrificing Pagans, trying to appeal to their particular belief system.


Sorry, but animal sacrifice was already a standard part of Temple Judaism as the article you quoted mentioned a few paragraphs later. Paul wouldn't need to get the idea of animal sacrifice from Mithraists - assuming there were any in the Roman Empire during his lifetime which hasn't been shown. The "ashes of an heifer sprinkling the unclean" seems to be an explicit reference to purification by the ashes of a red heifer - see Numbers chapter 19.

Also the idea of the Messiah dying and being himself a sacrifice for sin is not found in Mithraism or Zoroastrianism either. If people want to derive this from some earlier religion, I think they should look elsewhere.