Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Oeconomicus who wrote (157281)	5/15/2003 10:48:42 AM
From: zonder	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 164684

What on earth are you talking about? All I said was that Lizzie is right that women's life in Saddam's Iraq was much better than that in Saudi Arabia, a US ally. Let's see if I understand you two - because Saddam didn't treat women significantly worse than he treated anyone else and even let one build bio-weapons for him, and because other countries treat women poorly, he's really not such a bad guy and Iraqis would be better off with him than trying to form a democratic government, which is an inherently uncertain activity. That about cover it? Obviously, no. You have not understood. And that does not "cover it".