Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Skeeter Bug who wrote (157323)	5/18/2003 9:54:46 PM
From: Victor Lazlo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 164684

Skeeter, I've already said it doesn't matter. I think this is a tax code revision, and it 's not going to affect the economy either way. Most of it is back-loaded to future years. At least the marriage penalty will be taken away. I didn't htink we were talking social policy. I know a good number of people whi are self-made millioanires. Some of them never went to college. Next time you drive by a grungy machine shop, or a produce terminal with recent immigrants on the docks, ask yourself if the owner is spending all his or her money on rolex watches and Mercedes Benz's. ha! If you think it would be great to tax them out of existence, think again. If you want to know what real recycling is, i can show you any day of the week. It's aluminim and copper and other metals it ain't pretty. it isn't white collar inherited. But it is busy. Really busy. And it sure is profitable.