Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jacob Snyder who wrote (99054)	5/25/2003 10:38:27 AM
From: carranza2	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 281500

The whole "there are no WMDs" argument borders on the frivolous. The evidence is overwhelming that Saddam had them, the fact that they can't be found notwithstanding. How doyou refute the following: 1.- All the chemical weapons gear found during the war, the gas-masks, etc. 2.- The UN's previous findings. 3.- Saddam's use of them on the Kurds and Iranians. 4.- If Saddam did not have them, why did he not give complete and unfettered access to the inspectors? Why were they kicked out? Not the act of a rational man intent on preserving his power. In order to avoid war and sanctions, all he had to do was to allow complete access to the entire country. The whole line of discussion is simply ludicrous.