Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dexter Lives On who wrote (129324)	5/27/2003 10:33:30 AM
From: Mike Torrence	Respond to of 152472

You're like an ill informed mosquito.

To: Dexter Lives On who wrote (129324)	5/27/2003 11:09:28 AM
From: qveauriche	Read Replies (5) \| Respond to of 152472

Good morning robv- Please tell me the terms of the deal as you understand them. If the Moritz experts are right, the QCOM's press releases describing the terms of the deal would appear to be a monstrous and evident deception that would have come to light long before now. Two things tell me this isn't likely. First, Irwin Jacobs isn't in jail. Second, the joint press release the companies issued is pretty darn clear about the royalty arrangement. press.nokia.com As part of the agreement, Nokia will continue to pay royalties to Qualcomm for subscriber equipment at the same rates established by the terms of the original cross-license agreement in 1992, irrespective of the CDMA standard implemented. Any factually documented information to the contrary would be sincerely appreciated.